AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD SILVERMAN, BENJAMIN N. SPEVACK, WILLIAM GOLDIS AND SAMUEL SCHORR, Appellants.

As to defendants Spevack, Goldis and Schorr: judgment affirmed. As to defendant Silverman: judgment reversed and information dismissed on the ground that his guilt has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ.; HUBBS and FINCH, JJ., concur as to Spevack, Goldis and Schorr, but dissent as to Silverman and vote to affirm as to him. Taking no part: CRANE, Ch. J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SILVERMAN, SPEVACK, GOLDIS, SCHORR
(Jul 7, 1938)