AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of EDWARD FOSTER, Respondent, against GILLINDER BROS., INC., et al., Appellants. STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Respondent was employed as a glass gatherer and used an implement known as a "punny," weighing about ten pounds. The finding, supported by evidence, is that the continuous gathering and lifting of glass from a furnace involved a constant twisting and straining of the body. This process, from gradual stretching, resulted in a hernia which is a disease. ( Matter of Alpert v. Powers, 223 N.Y. 97, 101.) There is medical testimony that claimant's occupation would produce this disease and there are judicial decisions in other jurisdictions holding that hernia is an occupational disease. ( Marathon Paper Mills Co. v. Industrial Comm., 203 Wis. 17; Travellers' Ins. Co. v. Locke, 56 Fed. Rep. [2d] 443, 444.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF FOSTER v. GILLINDER BROS., INC
(Jul 7, 1938)