Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of FRED G. MORITT, Appellant and Respondent, against S. HOWARD COHEN et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York and the County Board of Canvassers of the County of Kings, et al., Defendants, and LLOYD I. HERZKA, Respondent and Appellant.

Per Curiam.

We give our judgment upon the ballots submitted to us for determination. We number them according to exhibit numbers. The following ballots, according to exhibit numbers, are declared void: 11, 60, 77, 81, 86, 90, 97, 107, 128, 29, 103, 106, 85.

The following ballots we find to be good and should be counted accordingly: 19, 44, 51 (objections withdrawn), 114 (objections withdrawn), 95, 115 (objections withdrawn), 119, 78, 123.

The order should be affirmed.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ., concur; FINCH, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MORITT v. COHEN, HERZKA
(Oct 27, 1938)