AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

REFRACTOLITE CORPORATION v. PRISMO HOLDING CORPORATION et al.

Patent infringement suit by the Refractolite Corporation against the Prismo Holding Corporation and others. On motion for summary judgment.

Motion denied.

COXE, District Judge.

I think it is too clear even for argument that such a case as this cannot be disposed of on motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The issues involve the validity and alleged infringement of two unadjudicated patents, and such questions can only be adequately determined after a trial.

The motion for summary judgment is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REFRACTOLITE CORP. v. PRISMO HOLDING CORP., (S.D.N.Y. 1938)
(Dec 20, 1938)