Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE THOMKIN CORPORATION v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, as such and as representati

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on an appeal taken from an order dated April 28, 1928, entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, overruling and denying a petition of the plaintiff below, appellant here, for a rehearing in this said cause. The final decree, as shown by the transcript, was dated February 5, 1938, and an appeal was not taken from the final decree. We have examined the petition for rehearing and the different exhibits attached, and made a part thereof, and have considered the materiality thereof and fail to find error on the part of the lower court in making the order appealed from, since the motion for rehearing presents no matter showing error that this Court can consider on the appeal taken only from the order denying a rehearing and not from the final decree.

Counsel for appellees filed a motion in this court to affirm the order appealed from and have assigned a number of grounds therefor, one of which being that the final decree was entered more than six months prior to the entry of the pending appeal and for said reason no appeal here would lie. It is not necessary to recite the other grounds of the motion to affirm, as we think and believe the appeal here is in principle controlled by Gasque v. Ball, 71 Fla. 257, 71 So. 329. The motion to affirmed the order appealed from is granted.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C.J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE THOMKIN CORP. v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, ET AL
(Dec 22, 1938)