Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALBERT J. LOMAX v. J.R. WATKINS COMPANY

Appeal — No Judgment Entered — Delay in Filing Transcript.

The refusal to permit defendant to withdraw pleas filed by him, and to file a denial of the execution of the instrument sued on, was not the subject of appeal, when no judgment had been entered.

Where the appeal was entered May 2nd, but the transcript of the record was not transmitted until October 3rd, and the only explanation offered was that a bill of exceptions presented in due time was overlooked and not signed until September 9th, but there was no place for the bill of exceptions, since the case had not proceeded beyond the written pleadings, and there was a delay of twenty-four days even after September 9th, a motion to dismiss the appeal was necessarily granted.

Decided January 18th, 1939.

The opinion was delivered per Curiam.

Unreported cases.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOMAX v. J.R. WATKINS COMPANY
(Jan 18, 1939)