Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Barnett, Admr., Appellant, v. Ross.

Practice — Non pros. — Insufficient statement of claim stricken off — Failure to file new statement.

1. A judgment of non pros. is properly entered where an insufficient statement of claim has been stricken off and the plaintiff refuses to file a more specific statement. [510-13]

Pleadings — Averments — Action against Fiduciary.

2. A statement of claim in a suit against an alleged fiduciary is insufficient which does not state with certainty how the fiduciary relation arose, the exact nature of it, and how it was breached. [511]

3. The rule that a fiduciary must explain and justify transactions in which he may have advantaged himself at the expense of the beneficiary is a rule of evidence rather than one of pleading. [512]

Argued January 4, 1939.

PER CURIAM, January 30, 1939:

The statement of claim in this case was clearly insufficient. The judgment of non pros. is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge BOK in the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARNETT v. ROSS
(Jan 30, 1939)