Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MANGENELLI v. LAHAGE.

At Law. Personal injury action by Angelone Mangenelli against Kalal Lahage. On defendant's motion for further answers to interrogatories.

Motion granted.

McLELLAN, District Judge

The defendant moves that the plaintiff be ordered to answer further Interrogatories 18 and 20 propounded to the plaintiff by the defendant.

The 18th interrogatory asks in substance if the plaintiff had any physical injuries, such as accidents, illnesses or diseases within three years prior or subsequent to the accident referred to in his declaration, to describe fully "their natures, giving places and dates". The plaintiff answered: "18. Injured while at work. Injuries non-contributory to present claims." The answer is insufficient, and the plaintiff is directed further to answer Interrogatory 18.

The 20th interrogatory asks the plaintiff, if employed at the time of the alleged accident, to describe his occupation, to state by whom he was employed, and in what capacity, to which the plaintiff answered: "20. Contractor. The contractor's name I do not recall." The answer is insufficient. The plaintiff is directed to answer Interrogatory 20 further.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MANGENELLI v. LAHAGE
(Feb 6, 1939)