IN RE LeVAN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Carey Lane ( Mr. Robert Carey
Mr. Harry Lane, of counsel), for the
Mr. Rudolph A. Huebner, for the respondent Joseph H.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

In the matter of the appeal from the decree of the orphans court of thecounty of Essex, decreeing that ORLANDO B. LeVAN predeceased John S. Gearyand that the estate of said Orlando B. LeVan be distributed according to theterms of the will admitted to probate in Essex county on September 30th,1935.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

IN RE LeVAN

In the matter of the appeal from the decree of the orphans court of thecounty of Essex, decreeing that ORLANDO B. LeVAN predeceased John S. Gearyand that the estate of said Orlando B. LeVan be distributed according to theterms of the will admitted to probate in Essex county on September 30th,1935.

Comments