Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Walter E. Barton, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners. F.E. Youngman, O.W. Hammonds, and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Jas. W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J.P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and DeWitt M. Evans, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Judges
  • Rufus Edward Foster
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Walter E. Barton, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners. F.E. Youngman, O.W. Hammonds, and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Jas. W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J.P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and DeWitt M. Evans, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Judges
  • Rufus Edward Foster
See more information ...
Smart Summary

S.P. FARISH, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Lottie Rice FARISH, Petitioner,

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

These two cases were consolidated before the Board with the cases of W.S. Farish and Libbie Rice Farish v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 63, and were submitted on the same record, under a stipulation that the same judgment should be entered in these cases as in the other two.

In each case the petition is allowed, the judgment of the Board is reversed and the causes remanded for further proceedings in conformity to the opinion entered in the cases of W.S. Farish and Libbie Rice Farish v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 63, decided this day.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

S.P. FARISH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(Apr 4, 1939)