Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WARD et al. v. HELIS.

PER CURIAM.

The court below will enter judgment for the appellants for their respective interests in the balance due under the contract, the same being $100,000, with legal interest. This interest shall be computed on $50,000 of the $100,000 from May 13, 1935, the day it became due. Interest on the remaining $50,000, which became due and payable from the proceeds derived from oil produced on the lease, shall be computed from the time a sufficient amount of oil was produced to pay this sum. The opinion is corrected in this regard. Since neither of the judges who concurred in the opinion desire a rehearing, the motion therefor is denied.

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARD v. HELIS
(Apr 26, 1939)