DRIGGERS v. CITY OF FLORENCE

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14879

Attorney(S)

Messrs. McEachin Townsend, for appellant, cite: As to improper maintenance and defects in streets: 159 S.C. 425; 157 S.E., 447; 164 S.C. 507; 162 S.E., 749; 171 S.C. 196; 171 S.E., 916; 107 S.C. 124; 92 S.E., 191; 113 S.C. 489; 101 S.E., 834; 94 S.C. 375; 78 S.E., 23; 88 S.C. 553; 71 S.E., 49; 139 S.C. 295; 137 S.E., 743; 169 S.C. 403; 169 S.E., 84; 84 S.C. 122; 65 S.E., 1030; 106 S.C. 255; 91 S.E., 203; 89 S.C. 511; 72 S.E., 228; 36 L.R.A. (N.S.), 363. Liability of joint tort-feasors for concurrent acts: 168 S.C. 481; 168 S.E., 826; 164 S.C. 351; 162 S.E., 325; 133 S.C. 351; 131 S.E., 265; 67 S.C. 499; 46 S.E., 335; 65 L.R.A., 286; 95 S.C. 124; 78 S.E., 705; 38 Cyc., 488; 233 S.W. 419; 17 A.L.R., 637; 135 A., 100; 49 A.L.R., 1227; 54 A., 1026; 22 R.C.L., 112; 106 S.E., 360; 69 S.W. 803. Constructive notice: 199 S.E., 525; 199 S.E., 207. Messrs. J.D. Gilland and W. Stokes Houck, for respondent, cite: Knowledge of defect: 129 S.C. 257; 123 S.E., 839; 169 S.C. 403; 169 S.E., 84.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14879

Attorney(S)

Messrs. McEachin Townsend, for appellant, cite: As to improper maintenance and defects in streets: 159 S.C. 425; 157 S.E., 447; 164 S.C. 507; 162 S.E., 749; 171 S.C. 196; 171 S.E., 916; 107 S.C. 124; 92 S.E., 191; 113 S.C. 489; 101 S.E., 834; 94 S.C. 375; 78 S.E., 23; 88 S.C. 553; 71 S.E., 49; 139 S.C. 295; 137 S.E., 743; 169 S.C. 403; 169 S.E., 84; 84 S.C. 122; 65 S.E., 1030; 106 S.C. 255; 91 S.E., 203; 89 S.C. 511; 72 S.E., 228; 36 L.R.A. (N.S.), 363. Liability of joint tort-feasors for concurrent acts: 168 S.C. 481; 168 S.E., 826; 164 S.C. 351; 162 S.E., 325; 133 S.C. 351; 131 S.E., 265; 67 S.C. 499; 46 S.E., 335; 65 L.R.A., 286; 95 S.C. 124; 78 S.E., 705; 38 Cyc., 488; 233 S.W. 419; 17 A.L.R., 637; 135 A., 100; 49 A.L.R., 1227; 54 A., 1026; 22 R.C.L., 112; 106 S.E., 360; 69 S.W. 803. Constructive notice: 199 S.E., 525; 199 S.E., 207. Messrs. J.D. Gilland and W. Stokes Houck, for respondent, cite: Knowledge of defect: 129 S.C. 257; 123 S.E., 839; 169 S.C. 403; 169 S.E., 84.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

DRIGGERS v. CITY OF FLORENCE.

May 11, 1939. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE STABLER.

We have read with care the testimony in this case, and are satisfied that the conclusions reached by the trial Judge are correct.

For the reasons stated in his order of nonsuit, therefore which will be reported, the judgment of the Court below is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES BONHAM, BAKER and FISHBURNE and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE H.F. RICE concur.

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.