AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES M. DUQUETTE, Respondent, against GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant. STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Claimant received accidental injuries on January 7, 1931, in the nature of contusions and lacerations of the left shin. He left his work and went to the employer's first aid room for treatment which was administered. He was absent from one-half to three-quarters of an hour. No further attention was required by claimant at that time and claimant was paid without deduction for the time that he was then absent from his work. Later claimant had trouble with the leg and in November, 1935, an amputation was necessary on account of the development of a malignant tumor. Claimant, on November 3, 1936, for the first time filed a claim for compensation. The claim is barred by section 28 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. ( Matter of Lissow v. Mabbett Motors, Inc., 279 N.Y. 585.) Award reversed, and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Matter of Lissow v. Mabbett Motors, Inc. ( 279 N.Y. 585). All concur; Bliss, J., not sitting.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DUQUETTE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
(May 10, 1939)