Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. SLOVENSKY v. TAYLOR, DIR. OF DEPT. OF LIQUOR CONTROL.

Civil service — Provisional appointment, after non-co mpetitive examination, in absence of eligible list — Appointee in classified service and may not be summarily removed — Sections 486-8(b), 486-14 and 486-17a, General Code.

BY THE COURT.

Upon examination of the pertinent statutes of Ohio relating to civil service, a majority of the court is of the opinion that one receiving a provisional appointment under Section 486-14, General Code, in the absence of an eligible list, becomes an appointee in the classified service within the contemplation of Section 486-8 ( b), General Code, entitled to retain his position during good behavior and efficient service, until the establishment of an eligible list, or until his services are terminated by arriving at the mandatory retirement age, or until the abolishment of the position, or a lay-off.

Being in the classified service, he may not be summarily dismissed; his removal is governed by Section 486-17 a, General Code.

The demurrer to the petition is overruled and, it being agreed that such determination is dispositive of the case, the writ is allowed.

Writ allowed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE, EX REL. v. TAYLOR
(Jul 5, 1939)