Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SOL KANTOR, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY AND PERTH AMBOY HOUSINGAUTHORITY, RESPONDENTS.

Where a rule to show cause is made, based on an affidavit containing statements of fact, the evidential force of the affidavit expires with the making of the rule, and the facts alleged in the original affidavit can be brought before the court only by depositions taken on notice; or, perhaps, by stipulation.

PARKER, J.

I think that the application is devoid of merit, but it is unnecessary to consider that question at length because the matter is not presented in such form as to call for any decision by the court.

No rule of practice is better settled than the rule that where a rule to show cause is made based on an affidavit containing statements of fact, the evidential force of the affidavit expires with the making of the rule to show cause, and that the facts alleged in the original affidavit can be brought before the court only by depositions taken on notice; or, perhaps, by stipulation. Peer v. Bloxham, 82 N.J. Law 288 , and cases cited, to which may be added Morris v. Quick, 45 Id. 308; Atkinson v. Prine, 46 Id. (at p. 33); Shadduck v. Marsh, 21 Id. 434, and Klein v. Adams Express Co., 61 Id. 530.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KANTOR v. PERTH AMBOY
(Jul 8, 1939)