Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DeVEBER KIRKPATRICK et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON, Respondent and Appellant.

Per Curiam.

Judgment entered upon order of the Appellate Division modified by reversing findings of fact made in the Appellate Division, Nos. 49, 52, 56, 64, 68 (6) and 68 (8). The claims covered by these findings, which are herewith disallowed, total $6,575.35. In regard to findings Nos. 53, 54, 55 and 59, which amount to a total of $1,397.05, 15% should be added for profit, a total of $209.56. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

The judgment entered upon the order of the Appellate Division in the sum of $18,906.63 with interest from July 1, 1925, should be modified to the sum of $12,520.44 with interest from July 1, 1925, and disbursements of $2,502.25, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur; LEHMAN and RIPPEY, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm; O'BRIEN, J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KIRKPATRICK v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON
(Jul 11, 1939)