Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEE NUFFER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT W. WARE, as Sheriff-coroner, etc., Defendant and Respondent; CHARLES W. HOOPER, Inter

GRIFFIN, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. Notice of appeal from the judgment in the above-entitled matter was filed by Charles W. Hooper, intervener, on June 24, 1939, with the clerk of Imperial County. [1] From the certificate of the clerk it appears that since filing of the notice of appeal no proceeding was ever instituted for the preparation of a bill of exceptions or a transcript under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the time to institute the same has expired. Service of the notice of motion to dismiss was duly made.

Under the authority of Robinson v. Pismo Oil Dome Co., 31 Cal.App. (2d) 716 [ 88 P.2d 725], the appeal is dismissed.

Marks, Acting P.J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NUFFER v. WARE
(Sep 19, 1939)