AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MOHAWK MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Respondent, against ERNEST CAVICCHI, Doing Business as WADE BUTTON Co., Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

"A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon in this proceeding by this court, viz., that article 84 of the Civil Practice Act of New York (as applied here to a cause of action arising under the patent laws) is repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States in that it offends article 1, section 8, of the Constitution and section 256 of the Judicial Code. This court held that article 84 of the Civil Practice Act (as applied here to a cause of action arising under the patent laws) is not repugnant to article 1, section 8, of the Constitution and does not offend section 256 of the Judicial Code." (See 281 N.Y. 629.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MOHAWK MANUFACTURING CO., INC. v. CAVICCHI
(Sep 26, 1939)