Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Insurance — Life — Non-standard policy — Dividends applied on premiums — Cash surrender or loan value — Competency of insured not determined by trial court — Interest on loan held improperly computed and surrender invalid — Section 9420, General Code — Court of Appeals reversed and rendered final judgment — Issue of competency determined, when — Lapse of policy — Sections 5 and 16, Article I, and Section 6, Article IV, Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, MYERS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.