Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of PAUL CROSBIE, Respondent, against S. HOWARD COHEN et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Per Curiam.

The subscribing witnesses failed to state the election and Assembly districts wherein were located their present addresses and the addresses from which they last registered.

We think this departure from the requirements of section 135 of the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17), as amended by chapter 652 of the Laws of 1939, was so substantial as to invalidate the petition.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur; O'BRIEN, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CROSBIE v. COHEN
(Oct 20, 1939)