Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LILLIE F. HEYL, indi v. dually and trading as the ASBURY DINER,complainant-respondent,

Kitty Kelly Shoe Corp. v. United Retail, c., Local 108, 126 N.J. Eq. 318, followed.

PER CURIAM.

Complainant is the owner and operator of a restaurant of the type commonly known as a "diner." On November 21st, 1938, such of her employes as were members of the defendant union walked out. Picketing immediately followed. Chancery, on the filing of complainant's bill for injunction and the submission of proofs, allowed an order to show cause and on the return thereof found that complainant had employed new workers to take the place of all the strikers, that the business was being continued normally and that consequently there was no longer a strike, whereupon it issued a restraint pendente lite. The appeal is from that restraint order.

The case is subject to the comments and to the same disposition as are being made concurrently herewith in Kitty Kelly Shoe Corp. v. United Retail, c., Local 108, 126 N.J. Eq. 318.

The order under appeal will be reversed and the cause remanded.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEYL v. CULINARY ALLIANCE, LOCAL 611
(Oct 26, 1939)