AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ALMA B. JACKMAN, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS JACKMAN, Defendant; HAROLD G. WINANS, Appellant.

The interlocutory decree was granted March 6, 1937, and was entered in Otsego county March 12, 1937. Said interlocutory decree provided, among other things, that it would become the final judgment three months after the entry thereof. It accordingly became final on the 12th day of June, 1937. On the 7th day of June, 1937, plaintiff respondent and appellant Winans were married, apparently under a mistaken assumption that the divorce became final three months after the granting of the interlocutory decree. They lived together until April, 1939, when plaintiff respondent instituted an action for separation. The order appealed from was made during the separation action, which is still pending. The court held that there was no suggestion that the plaintiff acted in bad faith and ordered that the interlocutory decree be considered re-entered in the clerk's office as of March 6, 1937. Clearly, the equities were in favor of the plaintiff and the court exercised sound discretion in granting the order. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACKMAN v. JACKMAN
(Nov 22, 1939)