AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the NEW YORK STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and Others, Petitioners, Respondents, against KLEEN-RITE PROCESS CORPORATION, Appellant. HARRY UROVSKY, Appellant. In the Matter of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK on the Relation of NEW YORK STATE LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and Others, Respondents, against KLEEN-RITE PROCESS CORPORATION, Appellant. HARRY UROVSKY, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The court did not acquire jurisdiction to punish the appellant Harry Urovsky for contempt for the reason that he was not made a party to this proceeding by any process directed against him. (Judiciary Law, § 751.)

The order should also be modified as to the appellant Kleen-Rite Process Corporation by eliminating the fine of $250 imposed under section 773 Jud. of the Judiciary Law, stated in the order to represent the "costs and expenses" of the proceeding and directed to be paid to the New York State Labor Relations Board. The record contains no evidence of the amount of these costs and expenses, which, accordingly, cannot be allowed. ( People ex rel. Lawyers' Surety Co. v. Anthony, 7 App. Div. 132; affd., 151 N.Y. 620; Fenlon v. Dempsey, 50 Hun, 131.)

The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom all provisions for relief as against Harry Urovsky and further by eliminating the provision imposing a fine of $250 for costs and expenses on Kleen-Rite Process Corporation; and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant Harry Urovsky, and without costs to the appellant Kleen-Rite Process Corporation.

PER CURIAM.

Order unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and, as so modified, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant Harry Urovsky, and without costs to the appellant Kleen-Rite Process Corporation. Settle order on notice.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ST. LABOR REL. BD. v. KLEEN-RITE P. CORP
(Nov 17, 1939)