Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Vi v. an Irene Smetana, Minor, by the Li

TRIAL, § 15 — improper remarks by court. In action by girl riding bicycle across intersection for personal injuries sustained when struck by defendant's automobile allegedly crossing against red traffic light, remarks of trial judge were prejudicial to defendant and warranted new trial, where court frequently, instead of ruling directly upon defendant is objections, would make statements as to what the evidence had been, and, sometimes, the effect of same.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE SCANLAN.

"Not to be published in full."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMEATANA v. BRANNIN
(Dec 5, 1939)