Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETERSON v. ROBERTS, County Treas.

(Syllabus.)

STATES — TAXATION — 1939 Act authorizing reassessment of property taxed ad valorem for 1937 and prior years held unconstitutional — Syllabus adopted.

The syllabus in Ivester v. State (1938) 183 Okla. 519, 83 P.2d 193, is adopted as the syllabus herein.

HURST, J.

This action involves the constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 186 of the 17th Legislature (art. 22, ch. 65, S. L. 1939, 68 Okla. St. Ann. § 184e et seq.), authorizing the reduction of assessment for prior years. The act is in all material respects identical with an act passed by the Legislature in 1937, which was held unconstitutional by this court in Ivester v. State (1938) 183 Okla. 519, 83 P.2d 193. The Legislature, in effect, re-enacted the bill after this court had held it unconstitutional.

Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus, which the trial court denied, and plaintiff brings this appeal. It is contended that this act is materially different from the one previously held unconstitutional and that the decision in the Ivester Case should be overruled. The contentions made with reference to the distinctions between the 1937 and 1939 acts are not of sufficient merit to justify any comment, and we reaffirm our decision in the Ivester Case.

Judgment affirmed.

RILEY, CORN, GIBSON, and DANNER, JJ., concur. WELCH, V. C. J., dissents. OSBORN and DAVISON, JJ., absent. BAYLESS, C. J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETERSON v. ROBERTS
(Jan 30, 1940)