Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of SAMUEL BRAITER, Respondent, against ADDIE Co., INC., Appellant. STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

In the absence of proof that an employment certificate, vacation work permit or a certificate of age was on file in the place of claimant's employment (Labor Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 31], §§ 131, 132), it is no defense to a claim for double compensation under section 14-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), by a claimant employed in violation of section 131 of the Labor Law, that the employer was not negligent in determining the age of the claimant at the time of employment. ( Matter of Davidowicz v. Klipstein, 272 N.Y. 543; Matter of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box Co., 252 App. Div. 716; leave to appeal denied, 276 N.Y. 689.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BRAITER v. ADDIE CO
(Mar 5, 1940)