(Syllabus.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Review — Reversal where defendant in error fails to file brief.
Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions.
PER CURIAM.
On June 29, 1937, plaintiff in error filed case-made with petition in error attached in this court and on September 22, 1937, the brief of plaintiff in error was filed.
The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Upon the authority of City of Oklahoma City v. Blondin, 163 Okla. 276, 21 P.2d 1056, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and dismiss the action.
BAYLESS, C.J., WELCH, V. C.J., and RILEY, CORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.