McMILLAN v. KING et al

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

15033

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Cordie Page, R.B. Harrelson and W.R. Symmes, for appellant, cite: Specific performance of oral contract: 106 S.C. 519; 48 S.C. 86; 22 S.C. 454; 4 DeSaus., 188; 32 S.C. 259; 33 S.C. 194; 82 S.C. 4; 141 S.C. 265; 49 S.C. 77; 94 S.C. 272; 146 S.C. 59; 73 S.C. 155; 77 S.C. 516; 189 S.C. 270; 57 S.C. 559; 119 S.C. 171. Complaint: 45 S.C. 677; 50 S.C. 428; 56 S.C. 38; 152 S.C. 306; 28 S.C. 172; 139 S.C. 411. Messrs. Samuel Want, S.H. Schoolfield, Jr., and W. Marshall Bridges, for respondent, cite: Demurrer: 28 S.C. 172; 5 S.E., 352; 57 S.C. 147; 35 S.E., 499; 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 152 S.C. 305; 149 S.E., 243; 25 R. C.L., 747; 27 C.J., 372. Statute of Frauds: 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 106 S.C. 519; 91 S.E., 869; 124 S.C. 122; 117 S.E., 192; 94 S.C. 267; 77 S.E., 936. Admissibility of parol evidence to vary terms of written instrument: 96 S.C. 435; 81 S.E., 173; 52 S.C. 388; 29 S.E., 812; 111 S.C. 516; 99 S.E., 108; 148 S.C. 147; 145 S.E., 705.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

15033

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Cordie Page, R.B. Harrelson and W.R. Symmes, for appellant, cite: Specific performance of oral contract: 106 S.C. 519; 48 S.C. 86; 22 S.C. 454; 4 DeSaus., 188; 32 S.C. 259; 33 S.C. 194; 82 S.C. 4; 141 S.C. 265; 49 S.C. 77; 94 S.C. 272; 146 S.C. 59; 73 S.C. 155; 77 S.C. 516; 189 S.C. 270; 57 S.C. 559; 119 S.C. 171. Complaint: 45 S.C. 677; 50 S.C. 428; 56 S.C. 38; 152 S.C. 306; 28 S.C. 172; 139 S.C. 411. Messrs. Samuel Want, S.H. Schoolfield, Jr., and W. Marshall Bridges, for respondent, cite: Demurrer: 28 S.C. 172; 5 S.E., 352; 57 S.C. 147; 35 S.E., 499; 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 152 S.C. 305; 149 S.E., 243; 25 R. C.L., 747; 27 C.J., 372. Statute of Frauds: 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 106 S.C. 519; 91 S.E., 869; 124 S.C. 122; 117 S.E., 192; 94 S.C. 267; 77 S.E., 936. Admissibility of parol evidence to vary terms of written instrument: 96 S.C. 435; 81 S.E., 173; 52 S.C. 388; 29 S.E., 812; 111 S.C. 516; 99 S.E., 108; 148 S.C. 147; 145 S.E., 705.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

McMILLAN v. KING ET AL.

March 6, 1940.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. WM. H. GRIMBALL, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.Page 25

The conclusions of his Honor, Circuit Judge Dennis, in this cause are satisfactory to this Court. His decree is hereby affirmed.

Let the amended complaint and the decree of Judge Dennis be reported.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM and MESSRS. JUSTICES BAKER and FISHBURNE concur.

MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE DENNIS disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.