BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, § 95 — compensation of superintendent, sufficiency of evidence. In action on contract for services rendered in superintending construction of a church, judgment below for plaintiff was reversed, where evidence showed that a licensed architect was hired to superintend, and plaintiff claimed he was to receive the same compensation, 2 per cent of the cost, for the same work, the alleged contract had been made with a priest who subsequently died, and although there was some testimony that the priest had said plaintiff was to receive same compensation as he had for superintending a convent, there was no evidence as to the cost of the convent or compensation received.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE MATCHETT.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed April 8, 1940; rehearing denied April 22, 1940.