CARTER v. McCALL

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

15063

Attorney(S)

Mr. Henry E. Davis, for appellant, cites: As to commissions to broker in sale of property: 23 L.R.A., 588; 31 S.E., 629; 93 Am. Dec., 175; 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 86 S.C. 162; 68 S.E., 466; 150 S.C. 493; 148 S.E., 554; 177 S.C. 479; 181 S.E., 653; 36 A.S.R., 104; 28 R.C.L., 239; 69 C.J., 484; 58 Am. Dec., 714; 189 S.C. 414; 1 S.E.2d 494; 181 U.S. 531; 45 L.Ed., 986. Parol contract: 159 S.C. 446; 157 S.E., 621; 181 S.C. 360; 187 S.E., 524; 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 91 S.C. 7; 74 S.E., 46; 90 S.C. 522; 79 S.C. 134; 60 S.E., 311; 84 S.C. 181; 65 S.E., 1048; 181 S.C. 76; 186 S.E., 659; 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 116 S.E., 331. Messrs. McEachin Townsend, for respondent, cite: Parol agreement of broker with principal for compensation is not within the statutes of fraud: 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 40 S.E., 119; 40 S.E., 850; 84 S.E., 100; 131 S.C. 245; 126 S.E., 749.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

15063

Attorney(S)

Mr. Henry E. Davis, for appellant, cites: As to commissions to broker in sale of property: 23 L.R.A., 588; 31 S.E., 629; 93 Am. Dec., 175; 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 86 S.C. 162; 68 S.E., 466; 150 S.C. 493; 148 S.E., 554; 177 S.C. 479; 181 S.E., 653; 36 A.S.R., 104; 28 R.C.L., 239; 69 C.J., 484; 58 Am. Dec., 714; 189 S.C. 414; 1 S.E.2d 494; 181 U.S. 531; 45 L.Ed., 986. Parol contract: 159 S.C. 446; 157 S.E., 621; 181 S.C. 360; 187 S.E., 524; 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 91 S.C. 7; 74 S.E., 46; 90 S.C. 522; 79 S.C. 134; 60 S.E., 311; 84 S.C. 181; 65 S.E., 1048; 181 S.C. 76; 186 S.E., 659; 146 S.C. 59; 143 S.E., 552; 116 S.E., 331. Messrs. McEachin Townsend, for respondent, cite: Parol agreement of broker with principal for compensation is not within the statutes of fraud: 119 S.C. 171; 111 S.E., 881; 40 S.E., 119; 40 S.E., 850; 84 S.E., 100; 131 S.C. 245; 126 S.E., 749.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CARTER v. McCALL.

April 10, 1940.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. E.C. DENNIS, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.

This is an appeal from the Civil Court of Florence. A careful study of the testimony and the law shows that R. W. Sharkey, Judge of the Civil Court of Florence, has covered the facts and the law applicable thereto in an order refusing a new trial.

That order is affirmed and made the opinion of this Court. Let the order of Judge Sharkey refusing a new trial be reported.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM, MR. JUSTICE FISHBURNE and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE WM. H. GRIMBALL concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CARTER v. McCALL.

Comments