Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MELISSA A. WOOSTER vs. HERMON E. HUBBARD ET AL.

Those paragraphs of a complaint which allege matter evidential only, and an additional paragraph of the complaint which alleges elements of damage not allowable in such a cause of action as the complaint describes, are expunged.

CORNELL, J.

The motion is granted in the following respects because the matter referred to as it appears therein is evidential, only, viz., paragraphs 9, 15 and 16 ( Cook vs. Packard Motor Car Co., 88 Conn. 590, 592); likewise, with respect to paragraph 20, which alleges elements of damage not allowable in such a cause of action as the complaint describes, to reach which defect a motion to expunge appears to be the proper procedure. Seidler vs. Burns, 84 Conn. 111, 113.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOOSTER v. HUBBARD
(Apr 19, 1940)