Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Mann Mann, for appellant, cite: As to revocation of will where testator subsequent to making will had wife and children: Sec. 8922, Code 1932; 28 R.C.L., 187; 95 S.C. 118; 78 S.E., 711; 8 Rich. L., 135. Mr. W.E. Findley, for respondents, cites: Revocation of will: 95 S.C. 118; 78 S.E., 711.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Messrs. Mann Mann, for appellant, cite: As to revocation of will where testator subsequent to making will had wife and children: Sec. 8922, Code 1932; 28 R.C.L., 187; 95 S.C. 118; 78 S.E., 711; 8 Rich. L., 135. Mr. W.E. Findley, for respondents, cites: Revocation of will: 95 S.C. 118; 78 S.E., 711.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

McJUNKIN v. MOODY ET AL.

May 29, 1940. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE BAKER.

This Court being satisfied with the correctness of the concise and excellent order of Honorable L.D. Lide, presiding Judge, from which this appeal is taken, we adopt said order as the opinion of the Court, and direct that it be published herewith.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM and MESSRS. JUSTICES CARTER and FISHBURNE and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE J. STROM THURMOND concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

McJUNKIN v. MOODY et al
(May 29, 1940)