Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ATLANTA GAS-LIGHT COMPANY v. FARRELL et al.

BELL, Justice.

The Court of Appeals correctly held that the appliance in question became a part of the realty upon its installation as an adjunct of the furnace, and that as against the owner or a purchaser of the realty the tenant had no authority to contract with a conditional vendor for the removal of such appliance upon failure to pay the purchase money. Farrell v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 61 Ga. App. 18 ( 5 S.E.2d 607). The decision of the Court of Appeals appears to be correct as applied to the facts shown, and to afford no cause of complaint to the petitioner in certiorari.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 13191. JUNE 11, 1940.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATLANTA GAS-LIGHT COMPANY v. FARRELL
(Jun 11, 1940)