Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KENOBBIE, Respondent, v. KRAUSE, et al, Appellants

Deeds.

Evidence that at time of execution of deed to daughter, grantor executed five instruments purporting to transfer and convey all his property to divers persons and handed instruments to his wife, saying, "Here, Mother, you take care of them," that during the remaining nine years of grantor's life deed remained in his home in family safe, and that after grantor's death, deed was removed from safe and recorded, sustained judgment that deed was never delivered, and that grantee did not acquire title thereunder.

PER CURIAM.

In this action to quiet title the plaintiff, Mary Kenobbie, claims to have succeeded to the ownership of an undivided one-third interest in certain real property as an heir at law of her late father, Ernest Krause. The defendant, Hattie Krause, a sister of the plaintiff, claims a fee simple title to the same real property as a grantee of the said Ernest Krause. The trial court found that the deed under which the defendant claims was never in fact delivered. The testimony discloses that at the time of the execution of the deed in question the said Ernest Krause executed five instruments purporting to transfer and convey all of his property to divers persons and handed these instruments to his wife, saying, "Here, Mother, you take care of them." During the remaining nine years of the life of the said Ernest Krause, this conveyance remained in the home in the family safe to which both Mr. and Mrs. Krause had access. After the death of Ernest Krause the deed in question was removed from the safe and placed of record. From an examination of all of the competent evidence in the record, we are unable to say that the evidence clearly preponderates against the finding of the trial court to which we have adverted (cf. Stalting et al. v. Stalting et al., 52 S.D. 309, 217 N.W. 386), and the judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KENOBBIE v. KRAUSE
(Jul 29, 1940)