Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN MATTER OF ESTATE OF RAYMOND: SCHANTZ, EXRX., APPELLANT v. EXLINE, APPELLEE.

Executors and administrators — Proceedings to discover concealed assets — Section 10506-67, General Code — Gift a good defense, when — Evidence of insolvency of decedent inadmissible, when.

1. In a special proceeding under Section 10506-67 et seq., General Code, to discover assets of an estate, a defense that the articles in question were given to the defendant by the decedent, is good if proven.

2. In the trial of such matter, evidence that the decedent was insolvent at the time of the alleged gift should be rejected.

CARPENTER, J.

This was a special proceeding under Section 10506-67 et seq., General Code, by an executrix to recover possession of a cluster diamond ring and some antique dishes. The defendant claimed that they were given to her by decedent. The trial court sustained her claim, and this court cannot say that judgment was manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

The executrix claimed decedent was insolvent when the gift was made, and she offered evidence on that issue which the trial court excluded. There having been a gift of these articles, there was no concealment of them nor were they conveyed away as charged in the complaint. The issue of insolvency of decedent was not before the court any more than was mental incapacity in Goodrich, Admr., v. Anderson, 136 Ohio St. 509, 26 N.E.2d 1016.

Judgment affirmed.

OVERMYER and LLOYD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE ESTATE OF RAYMOND
(Oct 7, 1940)