Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ECHOLS v. THE STATE.

The evidence supported the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

DECIDED OCTOBER 19, 1940.

GARDNER, J.

We have read the brief of evidence carefully, and find that it reveals a previous difficulty of some kind which affected the relations of the deceased and the defendant. On the occasion of the homicide, after an exchange of words between them the deceased invited the defendant out of the building in which they then were. The defendant accepted the invitation, and the homicide occurred as the two were apparently leaving the building. The defendant "stuck a pistol right up back of his head and shot twice." The deceased fell, with his head lying about the bottom step with a gun lying across his breast. The judge submitted the offenses of murder and voluntary manslaughter. The jury returned a verdict of manslaughter. The State's evidence in substance, as summarized above, authorized the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ECHOLS v. STATE
(Oct 19, 1940)