Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

KATIE TANNENBAUM, complainant, v. SEACOAST TRUST COMPANY OF ASBURY PARK, acorporation, et al., defendants, and HARVEY S. JONES et al., executors of W.Har

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is from an order directing the clerk in Chancery to pay to the substituted trustee certain moneys deposited with him in satisfaction of a final decree in the above cause. The reasons for the final decree appear in 16 N.J. Mis. R. 234, affirmed in this court, 125 N.J. Eq. 360.

The reasons for the entrance of the order appealed from are clearly and explicitly stated in an opinion by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan filed February 23d 1940. Assuming, but not deciding that the order in question is properly before us, the same is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TANNENBAUM v. SEACOAST TRUST CO
(Oct 10, 1940)