Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Robert Allen, Plaintiff in Error, Gen. No. 41,108. People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error,

BETTING AND GAMING, § 5 — information, sufficiency. In prosecution under book-making statute, defendant could not contend that information was defective because the words "with any book, instrument or device" were omitted, because defendant has violated the statute if he recorded or registered bets or wagers, or sold pools upon the result of any trial or contest of skill, speed or power of endurance of man or beast, and judgment was not void because it ordered that fine and costs be worked out in default of payment (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, ch. 38, § 336; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 37.266).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE HEBEL.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed November 20, 1940.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ALLEN
(Nov 20, 1940)