AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

KAROL BORMAN, Respondent, v. HENRY PHIPPS ESTATES (a Domestic Corporation), Appellant.

TOWNLEY, J.

The judgment should be reversed for errors in the charge. The court in effect said that the failure of a person to call witnesses or produce evidence under his control permitted the inference that the evidence would be unfavorable to him. This charge is substantially the same as that in Milio v. Railway Motor Trucking Co. ( 257 App. Div. 640) where this court in reversing a judgment for the plaintiff said: "The failure to call a witness within the control of a party may justify giving greater weight to the testimony already in the case, but it never authorizes a jury to speculate as to what the uncalled witness would testify to."

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

MARTIN, P.J., and DORE, J., concur; O'MALLEY and COHN, JJ., dissent.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BORMAN v. PHIPPS ESTATES
(Nov 22, 1940)