Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SAMUEL ZIRN, Appellant, v. CLIFTON N. BRADLEY et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was found guilty of contempt of court and judgment entered dismissing his complaint. This was a final order. Neither the court at Special Term, nor the official referee, made any order of which the provisions were violated by plaintiff. The official referee properly refused to make such an order since he was presiding at an examination before trial and not trying any issues in a motion, action or proceeding referred to him under section 117 of the Judiciary Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 30).

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZIRN v. BRADLEY
(Dec 4, 1940)