Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FORRESTER v. THE STATE.

The court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

DECIDED JANUARY 23, 1941.

GARDNER, J.

The defendant was convicted under the Code, §§ 74-302, 74-303, of the offense of bastardy. The elements necessary to be proved to authorize a verdict of guilty of this offense are two: first, that the accused is the father of the child, and, second, that the accused has refused to give the statutory bond when required by a magistrate under a proper proceeding.

The evidence as to the first was issuable and the jury resolved it against the defendant. As to the second, the defendant through his counsel admitted the refusal to give the required bond. The preliminary warrant, together with the entries of finding and requirement of the magistrate, were admitted without objection. It would serve no good purpose further to detail the record. The verdict of guilty was authorized. Nutt v. State, 46 Ga. App. 725 ( 169 S.E. 49).

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FORRESTER v. STATE
(Jan 23, 1941)