Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OMER PEREZ ET AL. v. LAWRENCE HURSTELL.

PONDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a general election contest.

This case and the cases of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A.J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302, and Frank J. Campo v. Ben Acosta, La.Sup., 200 So. 305, were consolidated for the hearing of the appeals because identical issues were presented. The cases differ only in that different offices are involved. In each of them the defendant received more votes at the general election, by the voters writing in his name, than the plaintiff, whose name was printed on the ballot.

196 La. 926.

196 La. 936.

We have recited and discussed the issues presented in all of these cases in our opinion handed down this day in the case of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A.J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302,fn1 and for the reasons stated therein the judgment in this case is reversed and set aside; accordingly, the suit is dismissed at appellees' cost.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEREZ v. HURSTELL
(Feb 3, 1941)