AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO., Inc., et al.

Action by the United States of America against the Univis Lens Company, Incorporated, and others. On defendants' motion to quash the service.

Motion denied.

COXE, District Judge.

It is clear from the affidavits submitted on this motion that the corporate defendants are "transacting business" in the Southern District; that is all that is required to sustain the venue here under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 22. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 47 S.Ct. 400, 71 L.Ed. 684; Hansen Packing Company v. Armour Co., D.C., 16 F. Supp. 784; Sure-Fit Products Co. v. Fry Products Inc., D.C., 23 F. Supp. 610

The motion of the defendants to quash the service is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO., (S.D.N.Y. 1941)
(Feb 3, 1941)