Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Brink's, Inc., and Brink's Express Company, v. Elizabeth Gra

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS, § 133.1 — solicitation, as rendering fee contract invalid. In interpleader suit where tortfeasor paid amount of judgment for injured minor into court, and defendant claimed part of the money under an attorney's lien, evidence that a woman visited the minor's parents at the hospital shortly after the injury and urged the employment of defendant, the latter visited the parents at the hospital room and subsequently at their home, seeking employment, and his brother-in-law paid a moving bill of the parents, showed solicitation by defendant rendering his contingent for contract invalid, and estoppel by verdict was applicable to probate court's finding of solicitation when it vacated order authorizing defendant to act as attorney for guardian of minor.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

MATCHETT, J., dissenting.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE O'CONNOR.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed April 14, 1941.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRINK'S, INC. v. GRAVESON
(Apr 14, 1941)