PAMRAPAU CORP. v. BAYONNE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward A. Markley, Mr. William Rubin and Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, for the appellant. Messrs. Gross Gross, for the respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward A. Markley, Mr. William Rubin and Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, for the appellant. Messrs. Gross Gross, for the respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

PAMRAPAU CORPORATION, complainant-respondent, v. CITY OF BAYONNE,defendant-appellant; THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, INC., defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Kays.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

PAMRAPAU CORP. v. BAYONNE

PAMRAPAU CORPORATION, complainant-respondent, v. CITY OF BAYONNE,defendant-appellant; THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, INC., defendant.

Comments