FREEHOLD TRUST CO. v. KELSEY, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Quinn Doremus ( Mr. Thomas P. Doremus, of counsel), for the
Carton Abramoff ( Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, Jr. of counsel), for the

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

In the matter of the estate of ANDREW S. BUCKELEW, deceased.THE FREEHOLD TRUST COMPANY, as substituted trustee of the estate of AndrewS. Buckelew, deceased, accountant-appellant, v. META WHITE KELSEY, ELSIEWHITE TRUEX and ANDREW S. WHITE, exceptants-respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The facts herein are sufficiently set forth in the opinion below. It is our conclusion that the trust fund of $25,000 was controlled by the provision of the will restricting investments thereof to bonds and mortgages and the failure of the trustee to comply therewith justified the entry of the decree below. For this reason the decree appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

FREEHOLD TRUST CO. v. KELSEY

In the matter of the estate of ANDREW S. BUCKELEW, deceased.THE FREEHOLD TRUST COMPANY, as substituted trustee of the estate of AndrewS. Buckelew, deceased, accountant-appellant, v. META WHITE KELSEY, ELSIEWHITE TRUEX and ANDREW S. WHITE, exceptants-respondents.

Comments