Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Weinfeld v. Funk, Appellant.

Appeals — Review — Order granting new trial.

An order granting a new trial will not be reviewed where the lower court states that justice demands such action.

Argued April 24, 1941.

PER CURIAM, May 12, 1941:

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: "After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff's motion for a new trial be sustained." We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A.2d 394; Kerr v. Hofer, 341 Pa. 47, 17 A.2d 886.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEINFELD v. FUNK
(May 12, 1941)