Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NILSSON, Respondent, v. Krueger, et al, Appellants

Workmen's Compensation.

Where final settlement agreement, receipt, and release was duly filed with industrial commissioner and was not disapproved within 20 days, and where final payment was made thereunder, commissioner, had no jurisdiction to reopen and review such agreement, receipt and release.

PER CURIAM.

A certain instrument entitled "Final Compensation Settlement Receipt" was signed by the claimant April 25, 1936. The consideration was the sum of $490. This settlement agreement, final receipt, and release was received by the Industrial Commissioner in May, 1936, and thereafter no notice of disapproval of agreement of settlement was given by the Industrial Commissioner. Under the terms of the final receipt, payment was made in final settlement and satisfaction of all claims for compensation. This case is ruled by the opinion of this court in the case of Chittenden v. Alf. F. Jarvis et al., 297 N.W. 787. Opinion filed April 29, 1941.

The judgment appealed from is reversed.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NILSSON v. KRUEGER
(Jun 12, 1941)