Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN T. MULLANE, Respondent, v. JOHN McKENZIE, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in suspending the plaintiff relied upon the ruling of the Municipal Civil Service Commission that Carroll's original appointment in the service occurred on January 1, 1926. He was entitled to consult the commission and rely upon the advice given to him by it in connection with the question of the date of the original appointment of various employees. To hold him personally liable in the absence of bad faith for following the commission's ruling would tend to create chaos in public office. The dictum in McGraw v. Gresser ( 226 N.Y. 57), that "the law may not be violated * * * by public officials with good motives" is inapplicable here. It refers only to a situation where a public official violates the clear mandate of a statute, not to one where, in determining the date of an employee's original entry into the service, he follows the ruling of the municipal civil service commission on the question.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant, with costs.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, SHIENTAG and MILLER, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MULLANE v. McKENZIE
(Jun 19, 1941)