Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Daniel J. Hanlon, of Washington, D.C., and Wilbur E. Dow, Jr., of New York City, of the Bar of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for appellant. Nathan R. Margold, Sol., Leland O. Graham and David M. Hudson, Asst. Sol., Department of the Interior, W. Robert Koerner, of the Bar of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Daniel J. Hanlon, of Washington, D.C., and Wilbur E. Dow, Jr., of New York City, of the Bar of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for appellant. Nathan R. Margold, Sol., Leland O. Graham and David M. Hudson, Asst. Sol., Department of the Interior, W. Robert Koerner, of the Bar of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Jack N. GILBERT, Appellant, v. Harold L. ICKES, Secretary of the Interior, and Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of War, Appellees.

RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.

The appeal is from an order dismissing appellant's suit upon allegations identical in all substantial and material respects with those made in the complaint in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson, ___ App.D.C. ___, 123 F.2d 909, decided this day. The issues presented by the two cases are identical and the results must be the same. For the reasons which have been stated in the opinion which has been rendered in Dow v. Ickes and Stimson, the orders are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

GILBERT v. ICKES
(Aug 4, 1941)